|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | 从人权论争到人权共识:张彭春对《世界人权宣言》普遍性的贡献(英文)显示文摘《世界人权宣言》从着手起草到大会全体通过仅仅用了短短一年半的时间,这不得不说是国际人权法制史上的奇迹。除了二战的催化作用以外,张彭春作为《世界人权宣言》起草委员会的副主席,从《宣言》的文本内容到起草程序、策略均坚持了普遍性原则,从而制定出一份具有包容性、世俗性以及普遍代表性的《宣言》,从而能为世界绝大多数国家所接受,最终保证了《宣言》得以顺利通过。 | 化国宇 Ou Xiaoqi Robert D. Roderick | 2016 | China Legal Science2016，4，4： | 2 |
| 2 | 社会治理现代化与社会治理法学建设(英文)显示文摘Social governance is an integral part of the governance system in today's China. In 2013, the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) made the Decision o f the Central Committee of the CPC on Some Major Issues concerning Comprehensively Deepening the Reform, in which it was proposed that the overall goal of comprehensively deepening reform is to promote the modernization of the national governance system and capacity. In short, the goal is to modernize national governance. At the Central Political and Legal Work Conference five years later, General Secretary Xi Jinping also proposed to modernize social governance. The modernization of national governance and that of social governance are mutually reinforcing, which will significantly improve the socialism with Chinese characteristics and the governance of the Party and the country. | 张文显 Zhang Qing(Translated) Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 1 |
| 3 | 解决执行难的执行社会化路径探析(英文)显示文摘从本质上讲,执行难是一个社会问题,而非法院一家之“难”。要长效解决执行难的问题需将其纳入社会治理,在社会多方合力之下方能有所作为。因此,建基于社会治理之上的执行社会化理念便孕育而生。这一理念的实现路径为实务界高度关注。执行社会化路径是以执行供给侧与执行需求侧双驱为动力源,以多元化纠纷化解机制及解决执行难长效机制为基本依托。 | 邓蔚 Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 1 |
| 4 | 当代中国犯罪学研究的40年发展及展望(英文)显示文摘I. INTRODUCTION Since the founding of the Peoples Republic of China (PRC), the theoretical system of Chinese criminology has been gradually established, developed and enriched. Especially along with the progress of reform and opening-up in 1978, the theoretical research of Chinese criminology has been progressing rapidly. Professional research groups and institutions were established;the academic atmosphere of criminology research is becoming strong;and criminology in the position of criminal science is increasingly becoming prominent. The knowledge system of criminology was gradually formed. Description and evaluation of crime phenomena are more objective than before. Relatively great development in the theories regarding the essence, causation and countermeasure of crime has been achieved. Great progress has also been made in the practice of crime prevention and crime control. | 张小虎 Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 1 |
| 5 | Establishing a model spinal cord injury in the African green monkey for the preclinical evaluation of biodegradable polymer scaffolds seeded with human neural stem cells显示文摘 | Christopher D. Pritchard Jonathan R. Slotkin Dou Yu Haining Dai Matthew S. Lawrence Roderick T. Bronson Francis M. Reynolds Yang D. Teng Eric J. Woodard Robert S. Langer | 2010 | Journal of Neuroscience Methods2010，，： | 1 |
| 6 | 国际海底区域遗传资源开发制度构建(英文)显示文摘国际海底区域遗传资源开发制度的构建已成为国际社会急需解决的突出问题。解读现存遗传资源开发机制,可归于双边模式、多边模式及知识产权模式。在借鉴现有模式的基础上,宜将国际海底区域遗传资源确认为全人类共同继承财产,由国际海底管理局管理。同时,应突破平行开发局限,确立以国际海底管理局为主导的联合获取模式。在此基础上,重点建构以知识产权为基础,以公众利益为导向的惠益分享机制:在规范来源信息披露,严格专利授予条件的同时,扩展以货币和技术为内容的惠益分配,强化惠益分享监管。 | 徐莹 Qi Jun(Translated) Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 0 |
| 7 | 民事撤诉中被告同意权的规范异化与制度矫正(英文)显示文摘To protect the citizens’ legitimate civil rights from being violated or deprived is both the fundamental purpose of civil litigation and the core of the regulation on the theoretical and institutional construction of the civil litigation. The citizensT autonomy in exercising their private rights embodied in such purpose and core has been extended and applied into the civil procedure and transformed into the concept supporting civil litigation, disposition doctrine. The parties are granted the freedom of disposing their civil substantive rights and, more extensively, the right to go through or to abandon civil proceedings. As a procedural mechanism manifesting the above mentioned dual features of the disposition doctrine, the civil withdrawal system has been established in the modem civil procedural law. The Civil Procedural Law is not an exception. However, the provisions on the civil withdrawal system are not as specific as those on the system of filing civil cases, resulting in the considerably serious imbalance of interests and the disorder in regulating the courts exercising its solely enjoyed power to examine civil withdrawal. To solve these problems, the defendant's right to consent is introduced into article 238 of the Interpretation on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Interpretation on Civil Procedural Law), which is developed into a two-prong procedural construction of the defendant’s consent and the court’s final decision, and, to a great extent, promotes significant changes in the civil withdrawal system. However, new judicial interpretation on such systematic planning of the defendant s right to consent has brought about the possibility of regulation deviation and weakness of functions in many aspects instead of purification of rights, which need reflection and correction. | 唐玉富 Li Yan(Translated) Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 0 |
| 8 | 论一体建设法治社会(英文)显示文摘法治国家、法治政府、法治社会一体建设是中国建设发展的主观选择,是我国经济社会发展的迫切需求,中国特色社会主义理论是其思想基础,具有划时代的意义。相对于法治国家、法治政府,法治社会是指全部社会生活的民主化、法治化。法治国家、法治政府与法治社会要一体建设而非分体建设、要同步建设而非分步骤建设。要从理念和思维层面、国家治理体系和治理能力层面、社会自治能力层面充分认识法治社会建设的艰巨性、复杂性。我国法治社会建设的基本路径在于:以坚持党的领导为根本保证,以政府主导与社会共治为基本方式,以培育法治信仰、增强全民法治观念为突破口,以构建政社分开、权责明确、依法自治的现代社会组织体制为重点,以形成多元融贯的规则体系为支撑,实现政府治理和社会自我调节、居民自治良性互动,达到整个社会和谐有序、健康发展。 | 张鸣起 Dai Jiajia Robert D. Roderick | 2016 | China Legal Science2016，4，5： | 0 |
| 9 | 商法典解构主义背景下我国商法体系的构建(英文)显示文摘19世纪以来的近代商法将各种不同性质的经济行为纳入商法的规制范围,但合同自由原则和代表人制度等传统上被视为商法特有的原则和制度也被上升为民法的基本原则和制度。其结果导致商法在外延上扩大其适用范围的同时,商法独有的特性也逐步丧失,民法和商法之间的边界愈易模糊。为了理清民法和商法之间的关系,传统的大陆商法学者主要以商法的调整对象、商法主体的特殊性和商事行为的特殊性为理论基础,近年来也有学者以价值取向的差异性作为民商法界分的基础。但质疑商法独立性存在价值的民商合一论、商法解体论等观点也甚嚣尘上,并由此主导了许多国家的民商事立法。根据我国《民法总则》的规定,有限责任公司、股份有限公司和其他企业法人等都被纳入营利法人的范畴,成为民事主体的重要组成部分,表现出明显的民法商法化倾向。但由于营利性行为既无法作为普遍性规定有效融入民法所固有的以人为本的理念之中,也无法外化为具体的行为规则并作为民法基本法的补充,且法人并不能涵盖企业的全部,而企业主体无论在行为目的和行为要求上都明显有别于其他民事主体。因此在《民法总则》既已颁布的大背景下,强调企业的特殊性并构建以企业法为核心的商法制度,既有必要也有可能。 | Cui Wenyu Robert D. Roderick Ou Xiaoqi | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，4： | 0 |
| 10 | 中国土地信托制度的成长路径与创新实践(英文)显示文摘从21世纪初开始,伴随着农村土地改革,我国有些地区出现了不同形式的土地信托。各种形式的土地信托都存在着不足,如农民向信托让渡了土地经营权,但却不能享有农业生产增加的全部收益。在现存的各种土地信托中,农民既不是严格意义上的委托人,也不是准确意义上的受益人,他们既不能行使信托委托人可以对信托行使的控制权,也无法获得让渡权利后产生的全部收益。中国土地信托创立过程中面临的主要问题是受托人不便与个体农民进行订约。单位信托或类似的信托类型或许能够成为避免高交易成本并带来应用前景的途径。 | Yu Chaoyin Robert D. Roderick | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，4： | 0 |
| 11 | 在线纠纷解决体系的实践探索与发展路径(英文)显示文摘随着互联网技术的不断应用和完善,全球政治、经济、文化及社会发展都受到了不同程度的影响,各国社会矛盾纠纷化解难度也日益加大。在互联网背景下,纠纷解决的方式因为科学技术而转型,但是这种转型并非只是简单地将科学技术运用到传统的纠纷解决模式中,而是以科技和互联网思维为基础,重新构建出一种新的在线纠纷解决体系,更加方便当事人解决纠纷、更好地实现公平正义以及更能适应新时代的要求。这对提升社会治理水平,减少矛盾纠纷的发生,提高化解纠纷的效率及降低司法成本等方面都具有积极作用。通过对国内外实践、立法及相关理论问题的研究发现,目前我国尚未建立在线纠纷解决体系,对在线纠纷解决机制的探索起步晚,在法律、技术层面仍然存在很多问题。需要结合我国在线纠纷解决机制的发展现状,吸取域外成熟的实践经验,完善相关制度,继续发展互联网技术和提高在线纠纷解决机制的信任度,构建与国际社会接轨的在线纠纷解决体系,同时在在线纠纷解决体系探讨的过程中提出对在线纠纷解决机制的创新以及发展路径的思考。 | Yu Zhiqiang Dong Peiwen Robert D. Roderick Ou Xiaoqi | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，4： | 0 |
| 12 | 责任保险制度论:以公共性与商业性之契合发展为视角(英文)显示文摘我国责任保险制度发展面临的现实问题都可归结为责任保险的公共性与商业性之间的矛盾。从现代保险的四维属性来看,责任保险的公共性与商业性不仅不存在矛盾,二者的契合发展还具有必要性和可行性。应当以保险交易公平与合同自由、保险公共政策与经营技术的契合发展作为基本标准。未来从责任保险法与侵权责任法关系的理顺、保险产品的创新、强制保险的适度扩展、政策保险的商业化操作、保险监管机制的改良等方面进行制度优化。 | Luo Can Robert D. Roderick | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，4： | 0 |
| 13 | 我国金融衍生品交易构造下股权利益分离问题研究(英文)显示文摘The innovation of financial instruments keeps bringing challenges to the market and regulation systems. Derivatives create a variety of economic benefits and obligations which may influence the traditional legal concept in commercial and financial sectors. Although some primordial derivatives originated in the commercial practices, the nature of derivatives has raised intensive discussion in the legal history.?? The function of the derivatives is so broad that in the modern market there are so many complex categories of assets portfolios embedded with derivatives. What is the purpose of derivative transactions, risk hedging or speculation? People may blame derivatives as a measure of over-speculation that increases the volatility of the financial market. Derivatives could be detrimental to the market because of the high risks associated with speculation activities and the element of gambling may not be entirely eradicated. However, on the other hand, derivatives can also influence corporate governance. | Xu Ke Robert D. Roderick | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，4： | 0 |
| 14 | 中国司法荣誉制度研究:以2003年至2018年表彰的全国模范法官为研究对象(英文)显示文摘I. INTRODUCTION There have been many outstanding judges abroad, such as Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Benjamin N. Cardozo, Louis D. Brandeis, Learned Hand and so on. Thus, who are the outstanding judges in China? What are the characteristics of Chinese outstanding judges? How to be a National Model Judge in China? The following part of this paper will give us a brief portrayal of the reward activities conducted by the Supreme People’s Court of People’s Republic of China (SPC) over the past decades, which forms the current judicial honor system of China. | Mi Chuanzhen Robert D. Roderick | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，4： | 0 |
| 15 | 中国法学会宪法学研究会2019年年会综述显示文摘December 7-8,2019,the 2019 Annual Meeting of the China Association of Constitutional Law jointly organized by the China Association of Constitutional Law of the China Law Society,the Law School of South China University of Technology,the Guangdong Lawyers Association,and the Research Center for Intra-Party Regulations and Filing Review System of the South China University of Technology was held in Guangzhou.The opening ceremony was chaired by Jiang Wuzhen,Dean of the Law School of the South China University of Technology.Li Zheng,the Deputy President of the South China University of Technology,Chen Wenmin,the Executive Vice President of the Guangdong Law Society,Ye Naifeng,the Vice-Chairman of the Guangdong Lawyers Association,and Han Dayuan,the President of the China Association of Constitutional Law of the China Law Society,delivered speeches. | Li Jiesi(翻译) Robert D. Roderick(修订) | 2020 | China Legal Science2020，8，2： | 0 |
| 16 | 社会治理法学“三大体系”的逻辑结构及其进路(英文)显示文摘With the historical orientation for developing the three major systems in social governance jurisprudence in the new era as the theme, the 50 Scholars, Symposium on Social Governance Jurisprudence at the 5th Law-based Society·Changjiang (International) Forum was jointly sponsored by the Social Sciences in China Press, the China Legal Science Journals Press and the Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, organized by the Law School and the Center of Law Development and Judicial Reform of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, greatly supported by the China Law Society, the Bureau of Grassroots Governance of the Commission of Political and Legal Affairs of the CPC Central Committee, the Commission of Political and Legal Affairs of the Hubei Provincial Committee of the CPC and the Hubei Law Society and co-organized by eight schools, departments and think tanks from Wuhan University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, South-Central University for Nationalities, the Studies in Law and Business, the Law Review, the Jianghan Tribune, the Criminal Justice School, the Juris Master Research Center, the Intellectual Property Institute and the Research Center for China's High-Quality Development. | 徐凯 徐汉明 Hu Jinhua(Translated) Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 0 |
| 17 | 城乡建设用地置换法律问题研究:以新型权利为视角(英文)显示文摘面对耕地保护与城市化建设需要,各地在现有土地制度下开展的城乡建设用地置换实践已经孕育出土地开发权和土地发展权。土地开发权归属于土地产权人,是土地用途变更的权源。土地发展权则为相关增值利益确定归属:指标发送区宅基地的增值利益属于宅基地使用权人,其他建设用地的利益由地方政府、集体和集体成员共享。在指标接收区,集体成员对宅基地有优先开发权,地方政府可分得该收益;其他农村建设用地的增值收益应由集体、集体成员和地方政府共享。集体资源性资产收益属于集体。置换后,宅基地使用权人的土地权利或保持不变,或变为免费自动续期的城镇建设用地使用权,非集体成员只能受让期限不高于城镇住宅建设用地的地上权。 | 孙建伟 Robert D. Roderick(Revised) | 2019 | China Legal Science2019，7，5： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员