| 1 | Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names显示文摘Article 59.1,of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae,Fungi,and Plants(ICN;Melbourne Code),which addresses the nomenclature of pleomorphic fungi,became effective from 30 July 2011.Since that date,each fungal species can have one nomenclaturally correct name in a particular classification.All other previously used names for this species will be considered as synonyms.The older generic epithet takes priority over the younger name.Any widely used younger names proposed for use,must comply with Art.57.2 and their usage should be approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi(NCF).In this paper,we list all genera currently accepted by us in Dothideomycetes(belonging to 23 orders and 110 families),including pleomorphic and nonpleomorphic genera.In the case of pleomorphic genera,we follow the rulings of the current ICN and propose single generic names for future usage.The taxonomic placements of 1261 genera are listed as an outline.Protected names and suppressed names for 34 pleomorphic genera are listed separately.Notes and justifications are provided for possible proposed names after the list of genera.Notes are also provided on recent advances in our understanding of asexual and sexual morph linkages in Dothideomycetes.A phylogenetic tree based on four gene analyses supported 23 orders and 75 families,while 35 families still lack molecular data. | Nalin N.Wijayawardene Pedro W.Crous Paul M.Kirk David L.Hawksworth Saranyaphat Boonmee Uwe Braun Dong-Qin Dai Melvina J.D’souza Paul Diederich Asha Dissanayake Mingkhuan Doilom Singang Hongsanan E.B.Gareth Jones Johannes Z.Groenewald Ruvishika Jayawardena James D.Lawrey Jian-Kui Liu Robert Lücking Hugo Madrid Dimuthu S.Manamgoda Lucia Muggia Matthew P.Nelsen Rungtiwa Phookamsak Satinee Suetrong Kazuaki Tanaka Kasun M.Thambugala Dhanushka N.Wanasinghe Saowanee Wikee Ying Zhang Andre Aptroot H.A.Ariyawansa Ali H.Bahkali D.Jayarama Bhat Cécile Gueidan Putarak Chomnunti G.Sybren De Hoog Kerry Knudsen Wen-Jing Li Eric H.C.McKenzie Andrew N.Miller Alan J.L.Phillips Marcin Piatek Huzefa A.Raja Roger S.Shivas Bernad Slippers Joanne E.Taylor Qing Tian Yong Wang Joyce H.C.Woudenberg Lei Cai Walter M.Jaklitsch Kevin D.Hyde | 2014 | Fungal Diversity2014，，6： | 2 |
| 2 | Families of Dothideomycetes显示文摘Dothideomycetes comprise a highly diverse range of fungi characterized mainly by asci with two wall layers(bitunicate asci)and often with fissitunicate dehiscence.Many species are saprobes,with many asexual states comprising important plant pathogens.They are also endophytes,epiphytes,fungicolous,lichenized,or lichenicolous fungi.They occur in terrestrial,freshwater and marine habitats in almost every part of the world.We accept 105 families in Dothideomycetes with the new families Anteagloniaceae,Bambusicolaceae,Biatriosporaceae,Lichenoconiaceae,Muyocopronaceae,Paranectriellaceae,Roussoellaceae,Salsugineaceae,Seynesiopeltidaceae and Thyridariaceae introduced in this paper.Each family is provided with a description and notes,including asexual and asexual states,and if more than one genus is included,the type genus is also characterized.Each family is provided with at least one figure-plate,usually illustrating the type genus,a list of accepted genera,including asexual genera,and a key to these genera.A phylogenetic tree based on four gene combined analysis add support for 64 of the families and 22 orders,including the novel orders,Dyfrolomycetales,Lichenoconiales,Lichenotheliales,Monoblastiales,Natipusillales,Phaeotrichales and Strigulales.The paper is expected to provide a working document on Dothideomycetes which can be modified as new data comes to light.It is hoped that by illustrating types we provide stimulation and interest so that more work is carried out in this remarkable group of fungi. | Kevin D.Hyde E.B.Gareth Jones Jian-Kui Liu Hiran Ariyawansa Eric Boehm Saranyaphat Boonmee Uwe Braun Putarak Chomnunti Pedro W.Crous Dong-Qin Dai Paul Diederich Asha Dissanayake Mingkhuan Doilom Francesco Doveri Singang Hongsanan Ruvishika Jayawardena James D.Lawrey Yan-Mei Li Yong-Xiang Liu Robert Lücking Jutamart Monkai Lucia Muggia Matthew P.Nelsen Ka-Lai Pang Rungtiwa Phookamsak Indunil C.Senanayake Carol A.Shearer Satinee Suetrong Kazuaki Tanaka Kasun M.Thambugala Nalin N.Wijayawardene Saowanee Wikee Hai-Xia Wu Ying Zhang Begoña Aguirre-Hudson S.Aisyah Alias AndréAptroot Ali H.Bahkali Jose L.Bezerra D.Jayarama Bhat Erio Camporesi Ekachai Chukeatirote Cécile Gueidan David L.Hawksworth Kazuyuki Hirayama Sybren De Hoog Ji-Chuan Kang Kerry Knudsen Wen-Jing Li Xing-Hong Li Zou-Yi Liu Ausana Mapook Eric H.C.McKenzie Andrew N.Miller Peter E.Mortimer Alan J.L.Phillips Huzefa A.Raja Christian Scheuer Felix Schumm Joanne E.Taylor Qing Tian Saowaluck Tibpromma Dhanushka N.Wanasinghe Yong Wang Jian-Chu Xu Supalak Yacharoen Ji-Ye Yan Min Zhang | 2013 | Fungal Diversity2013，，6： | 1 |
| 4 | Phylogenetic placement of lichenicolous Phoma species in the Phaeosphaeriaceae(Pleosporales,Dothideomycetes)显示文摘More than twenty species of lichenicolous fungi have been described in Phoma,a large anamorphic genus of primarily plant-associated pathogens with broad geographic distributions.We obtained nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences from 19 fungal cultures isolated from specimens representing four described and two undescribed lichenicolous species in the genus.Our multilocus phylogeny indicates that lichenicolous Phoma species represent at least two phylogenetically distinct clades in the Phaeosphaeriaceae,one including a new species,Phoma puncteliae,isolated from a specimen of Punctelia rudecta collected inMaryland,USA,and another group of primarily lichenicolous species.This latter group includes four described lichenicolous Phoma species,an unidentified melanized rock fungus,and a new lichenicolous Phoma species isolated from Xanthomendoza species collected in Canada that we are naming P.xanthomendozae.Some specimens in this clade collected from different lichen genera and species were found to be very similar genetically,which calls into question the recent practice of recognizing lichenicolous Phoma species mainly by differences in host preference. | James D.Lawrey Paul Diederich Matthew P.Nelsen Colin Freebury Dries Van den Broeck Masoumeh Sikaroodi Damien Ertz | 2012 | Fungal Diversity2012，，4： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员