|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | COMPARISON OF THE ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS AND THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION显示文摘A comparison of two decision analysis tools for the analysis of strategic conflicts, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the graph model for conflict resolution, is carried out by applying them to the China-US TV dumping conflict. Firstly, the graph model is introduced along with practical procedures for modeling and analyzing conflicts using the decision support software, GMCR II. Next, ANP is explained, emphasizing structural features and procedures for synthesizing priorities. Then a framework for employing ANP to analyze strategic conflicts is designed and used to compare ANP to the graph model. The case study of the China-US TV dumping conflict provides a basis for the graph model and ANP to be compared; different features of the approaches are highlighted. The study shows that because of different theoretical backgrounds, ANP and the graph model for conflict analysis both provide useful information which can be combined to furnish a better understanding of a strategic conflict. | Xin SU Ye CHEN Keith W. HIPEL D. Marc KILGOUR | 2005 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2005，14，3： | 9 |
| 2 | OPTION PRIORITIZATION FOR UNKNOWN PREFERENCE显示文摘一种选择 prioritization 技术被开发高效地得到偏爱,未知、松脆,在战略冲突的决定制造者(数据管理系统) 。在为冲突分辨率的图模型,每 DM 有至少一种选择,其各个可以被选择。一种州,或可能的情形,当时,被形成所有数据管理系统做一种选择选择。软件 GMCR II 包含使让 modeller 进入用描述数据管理系统的按优先级排列的陈述在州上订的数据管理系统松脆的偏爱容易的一个选择 prioritization 过程比较喜欢的选择联合。这个过程被增加二新逻辑 connectives 扩大描述偏爱的无常。为每 DM,为各可行的状态的可能的分数的一个范围当时能是计算的,便于订的偏爱的决心由比较并且评价分数包含无常。为了表明这新方法论怎么能习惯于,处于一个真实世界的决定问题代表未知偏爱,它在建议的水出口上被用于加拿大的争论。 | Jing Yu Keith W. Hipel D. Marc Kilgour Min Zhao | 2016 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2016，25，1： | 5 |
| 3 | Strategic Analysis of a Regulatory Conflict Using Dempster-Shafer Theory and AHP for Preference Elicitation显示文摘Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are integrated in order to elicit preference information from experts regarding decision makers (DMs) involved in a regulatory conflict. More precisely, DST is used for combining expert knowledge regarding preferences of a specific DM (the regulatory body), and AHP is employed for ranking feasible states in the conflict for this same DM. In order to illustrate how this preference elicitation proposal can be conveniently implemented in practice within the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR), it is applied to a real construction dispute located in the city of Ipojuca, Brazil. The conflict is modeled with three DMs: support, opposition, and the regulatory body. Results show that the new preference methodology possesses many inherent advantages including high flexibility the ability to capture uncertainty or even ignorance about preferences, the possibility of combining expert knowledge with respect to missing preferences, and a substantial reduction in the number of pairwise comparisons of states required to express preference information. | Maisa M. Silva Keith W. Hipel D. Marc Kilgour Ana Paula C. S. Costa | 2019 | Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering2019，28，4： | 2 |
| 4 | Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East显示文摘 | Keith W. Hipel D. Marc Kilgour Rami A. Kinsara | 2014 | Group Decision and Negotiation2014，，： | 1 |
| 5 | Reconciling the two methods of measuring upper lethal temperatures in fishes显示文摘 | D. Marc Kilgour Robert W. McCauley | 1986 | Environmental Biology of Fishes1986，，4： | 1 |
| 6 | Matrix Representation of Conflict Resolution in Multiple-Decision-Maker Graph Models with Preference Uncertainty显示文摘 | Haiyan Xu D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2011 | Group Decision and Negotiation2011，，： | 1 |
| 7 | Equilibria for far-sighted players显示文摘 | D. Marc Kilgour | 1984 | Theory and Decision1984，，： | 1 |
| 8 | The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future显示文摘 | D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2005 | Group Decision and Negotiation2005，，： | 1 |
| 9 | The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis显示文摘 | Amer Obeidi Keith W. Hipel D. Marc Kilgour | 2005 | Group Decision and Negotiation2005，，6： | 1 |
| 10 | Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution显示文摘 | Luai Hamouda D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2004 | Group Decision and Negotiation2004，，5： | 1 |
| 11 | Coalition Analysis in Group Decision Support显示文摘 | D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel Liping Fang Xiaoyong (John) Peng | 2001 | Group Decision and Negotiation2001，，2： | 1 |
| 12 | A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis显示文摘 | Ye Chen Kevin W. Li D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2006 | Computers and Operations Research2006，，： | 1 |
| 13 | A case-based distance method for screening in multiple-criteria decision aid显示文摘 | Ye Chen D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2006 | Omega2006，，： | 1 |
| 14 | Matrix representation and extension of coalition analysis in group decision support显示文摘 | Haiyan Xu D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2010 | Computers and Mathematics with Applications2010，，5： | 1 |
| 15 | Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts显示文摘 | Luai Hamouda D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2005 | Applied Mathematics and Computation2005，，1： | 1 |
| 16 | Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution显示文摘 | Luai Hamouda D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel | 2004 | Group Decision and Negotiation2004，，5： | 1 |
| 17 | Coalition Analysis in Group Decision Support显示文摘 | D. Marc Kilgour Keith W. Hipel Liping Fang Xiaoyong (John) Peng | 2001 | Group Decision and Negotiation2001，，2： | 1 |
| 18 | A matrix approach to status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution显示文摘 | Haiyan Xu Kevin W. Li Keith W. Hipel D. Marc Kilgour | 2009 | Applied Mathematics and Computation2009，，2： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员