|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Difficult procedures,better outcomes显示文摘Despite the initial skepticism and challenges,minimally invasive liver surgery especially laparoscopic liver resections(LLR),has become a first-choice surgical treatment for various liver tumors in many specialized centers worldwide(1-3).It is a safe alternative to open surgery thanks to advantages such as reduced blood loss and complication rates,shorter hospital stay,and better quality of life(4-7).However,laparoscopy requires relatively long learning,and complex procedures are limited to high-volume expert centers(8). | Davit L.Aghayan Airazat M.Kazaryan Asmund Avdem Fretland Bjorn Edwin | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，4： | 0 |
| 2 | Long term oncological outcome of laparoscopic techniques in pancreatic cancer显示文摘The laparoscopic technique in distal pancreatic resection(LDP) has been widely accepted, and outcome data support the hypothesis that survival is improved,partly due to improved postoperative safety and recovery, thus optimizing treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. But laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD or Whipple-procedures) has spread more slowly, due to the complexity of the procedure. Surgical safety has been a problem in hospitals with low patient volume, resulting in raised postoperative mortality, requiring careful monitoring of outcome during the surgical learning curve. Robotic assistance is expected to improve surgical safety, but data on long term oncological outcome of laparoscopic Whipple procedures with or without robotic assistance is scarce. Future research should still focus surgical safety, but most importantly long term outcome, recorded as recurrence at maximal follow up or-at best-overall long term survival(OS). Available data show median survival above 2.5 years, five year OS more than 30% after LDP even in series with suboptimal adjuvant chemotherapy. Also after LPD, long term survival is reported equal to or longer than open resection. However, surgical safety during the learning curve of LPD is a problem, which hopefully can be facilitated by robotic assistance. Patient reported outcome should also be an endpoint in future trials, including patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. | Trond Buanes Bjorn Edwin | 2018 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2018，10，12： | 0 |
| 3 | Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases显示文摘Background:The use of laparoscopic(LLR)and robotic liver resections(RLR)has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours.A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours≥10 cm.Methods:This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge(≥10 cm)tumors at 42 international centers between 2002-2020.Results:One hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were included.The comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching(PSM)(73 vs.219).Before PSM,LLR was associated with significantly increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery,malignant pathology,liver cirrhosis and increased median blood.After PSM,RLR and LLR was associated with no significant difference in key perioperative outcomes including media operation time(242 vs.290 min,P=0.286),transfusion rate rate(19.2%vs.16.9%,P=0.652),median blood loss(200 vs.300 mL,P=0.694),open conversion rate(8.2%vs.11.0%,P=0.519),morbidity(28.8%vs.21.9%,P=0.221),major morbidity(4.1%vs.9.6%,P=0.152),mortality and postoperative length of stay(6 vs.6 days,P=0.435).Conclusions:RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent outcomes.There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR. | Tan-To Cheung Rong Liu Federica Cipriani Xiaoying Wang Mikhail Efanov David Fuks Gi-Hong Choi Nicholas L.Syn Charing C.N.Chong Fabrizio Di Benedetto Ricardo Robles-Campos Vincenzo Mazzaferro Fernando Rotellar Santiago Lopez-Ben James O.Park Alejandro Mejia Iswanto Sucandy Adrian K.H.Chiow Marco V.Marino Mikel Gastaca Jae Hoon Lee TPeter Kingham Mathieu D’Hondt Sung Hoon Choi Robert P.Sutcliffe Ho-Seong Han Chung-Ngai Tang Johann Pratschke Roberto I.Troisi Go Wakabayashi Daniel Cherqui Felice Giuliante Davit L.Aghayan Bjorn Edwin Olivier Scatton Atsushi Sugioka Tran Cong Duy Long Constantino Fondevila Mohammad Abu Hilal Andrea Ruzzenente Alessandro Ferrero Paulo Herman Kuo-Hsin Chen Luca Aldrighetti Brian K.P.Goh International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，2： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员